
24 days · 2 summary articles
NATO summit in Ankara ends with praise for Turkey's leadership amid U.S. tensions
Turkish-hosted NATO summit convenes as Erdoan asserts regional leadership amid rising tensions
The 36th NATO Heads of State and Government Summit in Ankara concluded on Wednesday with global media hailing Türkiye’s rising strategic importance, even as deep divisions over defense spending and U.S. leadership cast a shadow over the alliance’s future. International outlets from *The New York Times* to *Politico* and European broadsheets framed President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan as the summit’s clear winner, crediting his diplomatic acumen and Türkiye’s expanding defense sector for securing high-profile commitments, including a potential thaw in F-35 sales and U.S. support for lifting CAATSA sanctions.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s attendance—described by *Politico* as the primary reason for his presence—underscored Ankara’s diplomatic weight, with the American leader praising Erdoğan’s leadership and calling their relationship “probably better than ever.” German media, including *Die Welt* and *Süddeutsche Zeitung*, echoed this sentiment, declaring Türkiye an “indispensable regional power” and questioning whether it had become a “new power factor” in Euro-Atlantic security.
Yet beneath the summit’s outward unity, tensions simmered. Trump’s disruptive rhetoric—threatening to cut trade with Spain over defense spending and reviving demands to seize Greenland from NATO member Denmark—raised alarms about the alliance’s cohesion. While NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and European leaders sought to project a united front, Rutte acknowledged the U.S. as the alliance’s dominant actor, noting that America alone accounts for half of NATO’s economy and military power.
The summit’s outcomes reflected this duality. NATO reaffirmed its “ironclad commitment” to collective defense under Article 5, but the alliance’s future strategic direction remains uncertain amid shifting U.S. priorities and European efforts to fill the gap left by Washington’s increasingly transactional approach. Defense Minister Yaşar Güler emphasized Türkiye’s role in showcasing advanced defense cooperation, including a forum to enhance industrial collaboration among allies.
European leaders, while relieved by Trump’s softened tone—including his pledge to support Ukraine’s licensed production of Patriot missile interceptors—warned of deeper structural fissures. Former Pentagon official Jim Townsend cautioned that Trump’s volatility risks undermining NATO’s deterrence credibility, telling *Reuters*: “Even if Trump is kind, the damage is already done.”
Türkiye’s diplomatic triumph extended beyond defense. Presidential Communications Director Burhanettin Duran hailed the summit as proof of Ankara’s “active leadership” in strengthening transatlantic bonds, while German Chancellor Friedrich Merz declared the gathering the “dawn of a new, more European NATO,” acknowledging Trump’s criticism of European underinvestment.
Yet political obstacles persist. Serhat Süha Çubukçuoğlu of TRENDS Research noted that Türkiye’s defense sector gains are tempered by EU-related vetoes, such as its exclusion from the SAFE program despite NATO membership. Meanwhile, European media debated whether the summit’s unity was a fleeting illusion, with *La Repubblica* quoting Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov as cautiously welcoming Trump’s diplomatic overtures while warning of “erroneous assessments” on long-range missiles.
As NATO leaders depart Ankara, the alliance faces a paradox: a summit hailed as a success for Türkiye’s leadership and transatlantic unity, yet one that exposed the fragility of a 32-member bloc increasingly divided over burden-sharing, strategic priorities, and the very future of U.S. engagement.
Follow us for live European news
3 further sources not geolocated