Anthropic surges past OpenAI with 965 billion valuation after 65 billion funding round

12 articles·11 sources·updated 9 days ago·View in graph
franceestoniaunited states of americabusiness & finance

Anthropic surges past OpenAI with $965 billion valuation, securing $65 billion in fresh funding ahead of IPO

Anthropic, the artificial intelligence company behind the Claude chatbot, has overtaken its rival OpenAI in valuation, reaching $965 billion after a $65 billion funding round, according to multiple reports. The deal, led by investors including Apollo and Blackstone, positions Anthropic as the world’s most valuable AI startup and sets the stage for an expected initial public offering (IPO) later this year Al Jazeera Bloomberg France24.

The funding round, announced on Thursday, includes a $36 billion debt deal reportedly orchestrated by Apollo and Blackstone, underscoring the scale of investor confidence in Anthropic’s growth trajectory. The company, founded by former OpenAI employees and led by CEO Dario Amodei, has rapidly expanded its enterprise and consumer offerings, with Claude now competing directly with OpenAI’s ChatGPT in both performance and market adoption Die Presse FAZ.

Anthropic’s valuation leap reflects broader industry trends, as AI companies attract unprecedented capital amid fierce competition for dominance in generative AI. The company’s rise also coincides with heightened political spending by AI-aligned groups in the U.S., where PACs like *Leading the Future*—backed by OpenAI and other tech firms—have poured millions into congressional primaries to shape AI policy. In New York’s 12th District, for example, Anthropic-linked *Jobs and Democracy PAC* has countered spending by OpenAI-backed *Think Big* to influence the race Axios.

With its IPO on the horizon, Anthropic’s valuation now eclipses OpenAI’s last reported figure of $86 billion, though OpenAI’s revenue and user base—particularly through Microsoft’s integration of its models—remain formidable. Analysts suggest the funding round could fuel further expansion into enterprise AI, cloud partnerships, and regulatory lobbying, as the company seeks to solidify its lead in a sector where capital and talent remain the primary battlegrounds.

Share
Story Timeline2 stories

Anthropic surges past OpenAI with 965 billion valuation after 65 billion funding round

◄ latestoldest ►
Political Spectrum Coverage9 sources mapped
CentreCentreRightRightLeftCentreLeft
  • aljazeera
  • die zeit
  • swissinfo
  • courrier international
  • axios
  • france24
  • die presse
  • financial times
  • faz

Articles

Live From Europe

KI-Unternehmen Anthropic ist nun wertvoller als OpenAI Das KI-Unternehmen wird mit 965 Mrd. Dollar bewertet und plant noch in diesem Jahr einen Börsengang.

die presse · 9 days ago

Geordie raises $30M to bring security and governance to agentic AI Geordie AI, a security and governance platform for AIagents, has raised $30 million in a Series A funding round led by Balderton Capital. The round also included participation from Crosspoint Capital,...

Geordie raises $30M to bring security and governance to agentic AI Geordie AI, a security and governance platform for AIagents, has raised $30 million in a Series A funding round led by Balderton Capital. The round also included participation from Crosspoint Capital,...

tech.eu · 9 days ago

Live From Europe

AIs next pharma challenge: tackling costly and risky clinical trials AI has transformed the search for new medicines. Now drug companies are betting it can fix the slow, expensive process of testing them in humans. Ask a pharmaceutical company about the current approach to clinical trials and youre likely to hear a chorus of complaints about a broken and dysfunctional system. It takes on average at least a decade and roughly $1-2 billion (CHF790 million-1.6 billion) to develop a new drug. Around 60-70 of that time is spent in the three phases of human testing. The longer a clinical trial takes, the longer it takes for that medicine to reach patients. To make matters worse, companies often waste time and money on trials for drugs that arent ultimately approved by regulators. For every 100 drugs that begin human trials, about 90 arent given the green light because the tests fail to prove the medicines are safe or effective. The industry has just accepted that risk and failure are a part of drug development because there has been no other option, ...

swissinfo · 9 days ago

Innovent Biologics, Pfizer strike $10.5 bln cancer drug deal amid China biotech boom reut.rs/3PKsf8W

Innovent Biologics, Pfizer strike $10.5 bln cancer drug deal amid China biotech boom reut.rs/3PKsf8W

bluesky bot · 9 days ago

Comment une idée folle a permis une avancée majeure dans le traitement du cancer du pancréas Lentreprise Revolution Medicines a indiqué en avril avoir développé un médicament capable dallonger la durée de vie de patients atteints dun cancer du pancréas. Ses résultats seront présentés au congrès annuel des oncologues, qui se tient à Chicago du 29 mai au 2 juin. The New York Times retrace lhistoire de cette percée majeure.

Comment une idée folle a permis une avancée majeure dans le traitement du cancer du pancréas Lentreprise Revolution Medicines a indiqué en avril avoir développé un médicament capable dallonger la durée de vie de patients atteints dun cancer du pancréas. Ses résultats seront présentés au congrès annuel des oncologues, qui se tient à Chicago du 29 mai au 2 juin. The New York Times retrace lhistoire de cette percée majeure.

courrier international · 9 days ago

Live From Europe

Investors race to get exposure to SpaceX ahead of IPO Net $14bn pours into funds with stakes in rocket company while ETF providers line up wave of new products

financial times · 9 days ago

Live From Europe

Anthropic soars to $965bn valuation, leapfrogging OpenAI Claude maker raises $65bn from investors ahead of expected initial public offering.

aljazeera · 9 days ago

Apollo, Blackstone work on $36 billion debt deal for Anthropic, Bloomberg News reports reut.rs/4uETHEk

Apollo, Blackstone work on $36 billion debt deal for Anthropic, Bloomberg News reports reut.rs/4uETHEk

bluesky bot · 9 days ago

How AI, crypto and AIPAC are ending political careers AI companies, the cryptocurrency industry and pro-Israel groups are spending like never before to sink their least favorite members of Congress and congressional candidates.Why it matters: The volume cannot be ignored. Its the kind of spending that can kill careers and stop political movements in their tracks.Pro-Israel groups spent nearly $8 million to oust GOP Rep. Thomas Massie in Kentuckys 4th District, helping to fuel the most expensive House primary in American history.Crypto-aligned Protect Progress was by far the largest spender in Texas 18th District, pouring nearly $5 million into unseating longtime Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) in favor of freshman Rep. Christian Menefee (D-Texas).By the numbers: Eight of the 12 top outside spenders in House primaries this cycle are PACs affiliated with crypto, AI or pro-Israel groups, an Axios analysis of FEC data found. That includes the top four:Protect Progress, the Democratic arm of leading cryptocurrency PAC Fairshake, had spent the most as of Thursday with $15.8 million across nearly a dozen Democratic primaries.United Democracy Project, affiliated with AIPAC, has spent $11.6 million — including against Massie and former Rep. Tom Malinowski (D-N.J.).Elect Chicago Women, an AIPAC-aligned organization, spent an eye-watering $9.8 million to support just two House candidates in Illinois: former Rep. Melissa Bean (D-Ill.) and state Sen. Laura Fine.Think Big, the Democratic arm of pro-AI PAC Leading the Future, has spent $8.2 million, including support for Bean. Its going after New York U.S. House candidate Alex Bores for his support for AI guardrails.Zoom out: The only entities that can really compete with these levels of spending are the two parties main super PACs, the Democrats House Majority PAC and the Republicans Congressional Leadership Fund.These groups rarely spend large sums in primaries, however, focusing their energy on supporting battleground-district candidates in the general election.The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has gotten involved in a few primaries, but only to protect its chosen candidates from what it alleges is GOP meddling.That leaves House primaries open for outside groups to flood the zone with as much spending as they deem necessary to get their preferred candidates over the finish line.Between the lines: House members and candidates targeted by this spending have tried to make the groups presence the big issue in their primaries, but the tactic has had mixed results.Some progressives, such as Daniel Biss and Analilia Mejia, have been able to make that strategy work by narrowly homing in on AIPACs involvement in their races.But crypto and AI groups have largely succeeded in elevating their preferred candidates, with AIPAC also notching several wins using groups such as Elect Chicago Women to obscure their intervention.There seems to be even less of a stigma on the GOP side: AIPAC didnt hide its involvement in Kentuckys 4th, for instance, but Massies attacks on it and other pro-Israel groups and donors failed to help him keep his seat.What theyre saying: Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas) told Axios in a phone interview Thursday that "people want to campaign on" these PACs spending against them, but "quite frankly, I dont think that many people are ... moved by it."Lawmakers and candidates "like the idea that people are moved by it, and ... like the romanticism that people are moved by it," he said, "but I dont think people really give a sh*t."Veasey said he, like many of his Democratic colleagues, wants to eliminate big money in politics, but "people have to figure out how to work in that world ... and be realistic."Yes, but: Some arent convinced that this spending adds up to an unstoppable behemoth."You dont have to spend hundreds of millions of dollars if your candidates or policies are popular," said Usamah Andrabi, a spokesperson for the left-wing Justice Democrats — which often finds itself on the opposite end of this spending.Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) said AIPAC has "overplayed its hand" with its heavy-handed involvement in Democratic primaries in recent cycles, arguing that it will "take a long time for them to rebuild their credibility."What to watch: These groups arent nearly done yet, with plenty of primaries still ahead.Marylands 5th District: UDP and Protect Progress have both spent heavily in the race to replace former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.). Both are backing Hoyer-endorsed state Del. Adrian Boafo.New Yorks 12th District: While drawing millions in opposition from Think Big — whose donors include OpenAI — Bores has received support from Anthropic-backed Jobs and Democracy PAC, as well as crypto-aligned PAC You Can Push Back.

How AI, crypto and AIPAC are ending political careers AI companies, the cryptocurrency industry and pro-Israel groups are spending like never before to sink their least favorite members of Congress and congressional candidates.Why it matters: The volume cannot be ignored. Its the kind of spending that can kill careers and stop political movements in their tracks.Pro-Israel groups spent nearly $8 million to oust GOP Rep. Thomas Massie in Kentuckys 4th District, helping to fuel the most expensive House primary in American history.Crypto-aligned Protect Progress was by far the largest spender in Texas 18th District, pouring nearly $5 million into unseating longtime Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) in favor of freshman Rep. Christian Menefee (D-Texas).By the numbers: Eight of the 12 top outside spenders in House primaries this cycle are PACs affiliated with crypto, AI or pro-Israel groups, an Axios analysis of FEC data found. That includes the top four:Protect Progress, the Democratic arm of leading cryptocurrency PAC Fairshake, had spent the most as of Thursday with $15.8 million across nearly a dozen Democratic primaries.United Democracy Project, affiliated with AIPAC, has spent $11.6 million — including against Massie and former Rep. Tom Malinowski (D-N.J.).Elect Chicago Women, an AIPAC-aligned organization, spent an eye-watering $9.8 million to support just two House candidates in Illinois: former Rep. Melissa Bean (D-Ill.) and state Sen. Laura Fine.Think Big, the Democratic arm of pro-AI PAC Leading the Future, has spent $8.2 million, including support for Bean. Its going after New York U.S. House candidate Alex Bores for his support for AI guardrails.Zoom out: The only entities that can really compete with these levels of spending are the two parties main super PACs, the Democrats House Majority PAC and the Republicans Congressional Leadership Fund.These groups rarely spend large sums in primaries, however, focusing their energy on supporting battleground-district candidates in the general election.The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has gotten involved in a few primaries, but only to protect its chosen candidates from what it alleges is GOP meddling.That leaves House primaries open for outside groups to flood the zone with as much spending as they deem necessary to get their preferred candidates over the finish line.Between the lines: House members and candidates targeted by this spending have tried to make the groups presence the big issue in their primaries, but the tactic has had mixed results.Some progressives, such as Daniel Biss and Analilia Mejia, have been able to make that strategy work by narrowly homing in on AIPACs involvement in their races.But crypto and AI groups have largely succeeded in elevating their preferred candidates, with AIPAC also notching several wins using groups such as Elect Chicago Women to obscure their intervention.There seems to be even less of a stigma on the GOP side: AIPAC didnt hide its involvement in Kentuckys 4th, for instance, but Massies attacks on it and other pro-Israel groups and donors failed to help him keep his seat.What theyre saying: Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas) told Axios in a phone interview Thursday that "people want to campaign on" these PACs spending against them, but "quite frankly, I dont think that many people are ... moved by it."Lawmakers and candidates "like the idea that people are moved by it, and ... like the romanticism that people are moved by it," he said, "but I dont think people really give a sh*t."Veasey said he, like many of his Democratic colleagues, wants to eliminate big money in politics, but "people have to figure out how to work in that world ... and be realistic."Yes, but: Some arent convinced that this spending adds up to an unstoppable behemoth."You dont have to spend hundreds of millions of dollars if your candidates or policies are popular," said Usamah Andrabi, a spokesperson for the left-wing Justice Democrats — which often finds itself on the opposite end of this spending.Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) said AIPAC has "overplayed its hand" with its heavy-handed involvement in Democratic primaries in recent cycles, arguing that it will "take a long time for them to rebuild their credibility."What to watch: These groups arent nearly done yet, with plenty of primaries still ahead.Marylands 5th District: UDP and Protect Progress have both spent heavily in the race to replace former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.). Both are backing Hoyer-endorsed state Del. Adrian Boafo.New Yorks 12th District: While drawing millions in opposition from Think Big — whose donors include OpenAI — Bores has received support from Anthropic-backed Jobs and Democracy PAC, as well as crypto-aligned PAC You Can Push Back.

axios · 9 days ago

Business-Ticker: Anthropic überholt Open AI Anthropic wird nun mit 965 Milliarden Dollar bewertet +++ Dell profitiert von KI-Boom +++ Milliardär kauft Kasino-Betreiber Caesars für 17,6 Milliarden Dollar +++ Neuigkeiten im Unternehmen-Liveblog.

Business-Ticker: Anthropic überholt Open AI Anthropic wird nun mit 965 Milliarden Dollar bewertet +++ Dell profitiert von KI-Boom +++ Milliardär kauft Kasino-Betreiber Caesars für 17,6 Milliarden Dollar +++ Neuigkeiten im Unternehmen-Liveblog.

faz · 9 days ago

Live From Europe

Anthropic valued at close to a trillion dollars in new funding round Artificial intelligence company Anthropic announced on Thursday that it had raised $65 billion in a new funding round, valuing the Claude maker (founded by former OpenAI employees and led by Dario Amodei) at $965 billion and placing it ahead of rival OpenAI.

france24 · 9 days ago

Live From Europe

Künstliche Intelligenz: Anthropic wird höher bewertet als OpenAI Nach neuen Investitionen wird das Unternehmen hinter dem Chatbot Claude mit 965 Milliarden US-Dollar bewertet. Damit überholt Anthropic seinen Konkurrenten OpenAI.

die zeit · 9 days ago

die pressetech.euswissinfobluesky botcourrier internationalfinancial timesaljazeeraaxiosfazfrance24die zeit