Defence Secretary John Healey resigns, accusing Starmer of failing to fund national security
Story Timeline
4 months · 3 summary articles
Starmer vows to fight Burnham leadership challenge as by-election fuels Labour power struggle
Andy Burnham pressures Keir Starmer to set resignation timetable
Defence Secretary John Healey resigns, accusing Starmer of failing to fund national security
British Defence Secretary John Healey resigned on Thursday, delivering a public broadside against Prime Minister Keir Starmer and deepening a crisis over military funding that threatens to destabilise the government. In a scathing letter posted on X, Healey accused Starmer of failing to provide the resources needed to defend the country, warning that the government’s Defence Investment Plan falls “well short of what is required for defence and the country at this dangerous time.” The resignation, which follows months of behind-the-scenes tension, immediately intensifies pressure on Starmer, who is already facing a potential leadership challenge and growing discontent within his own party.
Healey’s departure centres on a dispute over the scale and timing of defence spending. In his letter, he argued that the plan’s funding is “backloaded,” with the bulk of investment deferred until later years when operational pressures are most acute. By 2030, the plan would reach only 2.68% of GDP, below the 3% benchmark Healey has long advocated. “The excellent and exhaustive work intergovernmental work that concluded in January—supervised by you, me and the Chancellor—confirmed the magnitude of the challenge,” he wrote. “Since then, you have been unable, and the Treasury unwilling, to provide the resources the nation needs.” The letter’s reference to Chancellor Rachel Reeves underscores the depth of the rift, framing the dispute as a clash between fiscal restraint and national security imperatives.
The resignation comes as the UK faces mounting security challenges, including leading NATO’s Arctic Sentry mission, maintaining a presence in the Strait of Hormuz, and preparing for a potential deployment to Ukraine under the Paris Agreement. Healey, a vocal supporter of Ukraine, had been among the government’s most prominent advocates for increased military engagement. His departure risks undermining Britain’s credibility on the global stage and emboldening critics who argue Starmer’s government lacks a coherent defence strategy.
Starmer’s allies have sought to downplay the crisis, framing Healey’s resignation as a principled stand rather than a fatal blow. One government figure told *The Guardian* that the defence budget remains under review, but the optics of a high-profile resignation—especially one aired in such public terms—are undeniably damaging. The episode also highlights the broader tensions within Starmer’s Labour Party, where factions are increasingly divided between fiscal prudence and the demands of a rapidly shifting geopolitical landscape.
With Healey’s exit, Starmer must now navigate a treacherous political terrain, balancing the need for economic discipline with the urgent realities of global instability. The resignation underscores a fundamental question: whether a government committed to austerity can credibly claim to prioritise national security. For now, the crisis shows no signs of abating, and the coming weeks will determine whether Starmer can restore stability—or if this resignation is merely the first of many.
Follow us for live European news
- 4
- 2
- 2
- 2
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
3 further sources not geolocated

![El ministro de Defensa de Reino Unido dimite por la negativa de Starmer a aumentar más el gasto en defensa John Healy publica una carta de renuncia en la que afirma que no tenía "otra opción" que dejar el cargo ante las "crecientes amenazas" a la seguridad
El ministro de Defensa británico, John Healey, presentó este jueves su dimisión, en una decisión que tomó a todo el mundo por sorpresa.
Healey hizo pública una carta al primer ministro, Keir Starmer, en la que argumenta que no tenía otra opción por los desacuerdos entre ambos con respecto al Plan de Inversión de Defensa.
Esta nueva era para la defensa requería una mayor inversión a través del Plan de Inversión en Defensa (PID). El excelente y exhaustivo trabajo intergubernamental que concluyó en enero —supervisado por usted, yo y el ministro de Hacienda— confirmó la magnitud del desafío y las crecientes exigencias en materia de defensa. Desde entonces, usted no ha sido capaz, y el Tesoro no ha estado dispuesto, a destinar los recursos que la nación necesita para defenderse ante las crecientes amenazas, ha escrito el ministro en la misiva, que ha publicado en su cuenta en X. La mención al Tesoro implica un aldabonazo a la titular de Hacienda, Rachel Reeves.
El gasto militar del Reino Unido fue del 2,3, según las cifras de la OTAN para 2025, y lleva aumentando sin cesar desde 2016, tras una bajada en los años de la gran recesión. Para el ministro dimisionario, las previsiones de aumento son insuficientes.
El montante financiero del DIP [...] resulta insuficiente para la defensa y el país en este momento crítico. El apoyo adicional se concentra en los dos primeros años, cuando la presión operativa y la urgencia de acelerar la preparación para el combate se dan con mayor intensidad, y solo alcanza el 2,68 del PIB en 2030, cuando llegaremos al 2,6 el próximo año con la inversión que ya estamos realizando, justifica Healey en la carta.](https://static.eldiario.es/clip/8a1922ff-10b6-4f47-883c-9c0dbc05e828_16-9-discover-aspect-ratio_default_1145083.jpg)





