Progressive U.S. Senate candidate halts campaign after sexual assault allegations

Graham Platner, the progressive Democratic candidate for Maine’s U.S. Senate seat, abruptly suspended his campaign on Wednesday after multiple women accused him of sexual assault, a decision that throws the party’s midterm strategy into disarray just weeks before the July 27 deadline to replace him.
In a video posted on X, Platner announced he was halting campaign activities, citing pressure from party leaders and prominent Democrats who withdrew support following the allegations. “For the movement to continue, it cannot be me,” he said, denying the accusations as “categorically false.” The decision came hours after Maine Democrats held an emergency meeting, where over 100 state committee members approved a nominating convention to select a replacement candidate. The party has made clear Platner will have no role in choosing his successor.
The allegations surfaced on Monday when *Politico* and *The Washington Post* published accounts from two women who accused Platner of sexual misconduct. Jenny Racicot, a Maine resident, told *Politico* that in 2021, a heavily intoxicated Platner forced himself on her after she repeatedly said no. “I was raped,” she told CNN. A second woman, whose identity was not disclosed, alleged to *The Washington Post* that Platner removed condoms without her consent during sex. Both women said they had previously supported Platner’s politics but came forward after political opponents faced skepticism.
Platner’s campaign had already been plagued by controversy. Earlier this year, *The New York Times* reported that an ex-girlfriend accused him of physical violence during an argument, and his wife revealed in a video message that he had sent sexually explicit texts to other women while married. Platner also faced backlash for a chest tattoo resembling a Nazi symbol and past Reddit posts downplaying sexual assault in the military. Despite these scandals, he won the June 9 Democratic primary with 72% of the vote, defeating Maine Governor Janet Mills, who had been the establishment favorite.
The fallout was swift. Senator Bernie Sanders, Senator Elizabeth Warren, and Representative Ro Khanna all rescinded their endorsements, with Sanders calling the allegations “very serious and credible.” The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee warned it would not fund the race if Platner remained on the ballot. Platner, a Marine Corps veteran and oyster farmer who had never held elected office, had been a rising star in the party, positioning himself as an anti-establishment progressive. His exit leaves Democrats scrambling to find a candidate capable of unseating Republican Senator Susan Collins in a race critical to their hopes of flipping the Senate.
Democrats need to gain four seats to reclaim the chamber, where Republicans currently hold a 53-47 majority. Maine is one of the most competitive races in the 2026 midterms, alongside contests in Alaska, Ohio, and North Carolina. The party must now select a replacement by July 27, a process that risks alienating Platner’s grassroots supporters. Progressive strategist Andrew Feldman warned that a closed convention could dampen the energy needed to win, telling *Axios*: “It is going to be extremely challenging to pick a new nominee through a convention, not an open caucus.”
Platner framed his withdrawal as a defense of democratic principles, accusing the “corporate media system and the political establishment” of orchestrating his downfall. “This was the last week to try to get me off the ballot,” he said in his video. Yet his departure underscores the party’s dilemma: balancing accountability with electoral urgency in a race that could determine the balance of power in Washington. With Trump’s second term already mired in controversy, Democrats had hoped Platner’s candidacy would energize voters against Collins. Now, they must regroup—fast.
Follow us for live European news
- 5
- 3
- 2
- 2
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
4 further sources not geolocated








![House Democrats Jeffries-skeptic caucus isnt done growing Democratic primaries this summer could elevate another crop of incoming House members who have refused to commit to voting for Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) as speaker.Why it matters: This growing bloc of Jeffries skeptics could create real headaches for the Democratic leader as he attempts to form a united front to take on the Trump administration.Jeffries colleagues — left and center — widely expect him to become speaker if Democrats win the majority, noting that former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) faced similar rancor in 2018 and still secured the gavel.There is also no clear alternative to Jeffries, with House Democrats and candidates telling Axios there have been no indications anyone is preparing to challenge him.But even if this likely cohort of rebellious first-years does acquiesce to Jeffries on Jan. 3, they are not planning to make his tenure as speaker an easy one.State of play: Primaries in the spring and early summer have elevated several high-profile Democratic Socialists of America members who wont commit to voting for Jeffries, including Darializa Avila-Chevalier and Claire Valdez in New York and Adam Hamawy in New Jersey.Melat Kiros, who unseated Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) last week, told Axios she "will not vote for any Democrat for a leadership position if they take corporate PAC money," which would apply to Jeffries.Pennsylvania state Rep. Chris Rabb, the Democratic nominee in a safely blue U.S. House seat in Philadelphia, told Axios in an interview that Jeffries "supported a lot of the folks who my endorsees beat, and who made a lot of rhetoric that I found problematic."Whats next: The Michigan and Missouri primaries on Aug. 4 will determine whether the ranks of Jeffries skeptics grow even further.Former Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.), who is running for her old seat and previously voted for Jeffries on 19 speaker ballots in 2023, declined to commit to doing so in 2027 in an interview with Axios last week.William Lawrence, a progressive candidate in Michigans 7th District, said in an interview he looks forward to "voting for a Democratic speaker," but "will have to see how it all shakes out. I hope to have an alternative to Jeffries to vote for."Zoom in: Several other candidates with August or September primaries told Axios last fall they either wont commit to Jeffries or are outright opposed to him: Donavan McKinney of Michigan, Heath Howard of New Hampshire and Patrick Roath of Massachusetts.Angela Gonzales-Torres and Mai Vang, both of whom are facing runoffs in California with Democratic incumbents in November, are also in the Jeffries-skeptic column.The other side: Elijah Manley, running in Floridas 20th District, has changed his tune after previously opposing Jeffries. He told us last week the Democratic leader "will work with progressives to be the type of wartime leader that we need."Luke Bronin, who is primarying Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.), has also become supportive since the fall, telling Axios: "We should not start our majority by fighting over who should be speaker."What theyre saying: Jeffries has expressed stern confidence that these progressives ultimately wont stand between him and the speakership."I think Ive stood as the Democratic nominee for speaker now a total of 20 times because of dysfunction on the other side of the aisle, and I havent lost a single Democratic vote yet," he told reporters last week.New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a DSA member closely aligned with many of the incoming skeptics, has said he supports Jeffries for speaker.Yes, but: Even if Jeffries wins over his detractors and secures the gavel, he is all but certain to face constant headaches from his left flank in the battles ahead."People are tired of the weakness ... from Democratic party leadership who have lost to [Trump] not once but twice," Lawrence said.If Jeffries wins, Rabb said, "We have to have a pivot point on the question: What are the expectations you have of a Democratic speaker of the House, and how does that correlate to how you ran?"The bottom line: Even as House Democrats largely dismiss the possibility of anyone in the caucus making a run at Jeffries, some are also cautioning that — in this wild political climate — nothing can be ruled out."Its an unusual political year," one House Democrat told Axios. "Anything could happen."Editors note: This story has been updated with a statement from Luke Bronin expressing support for Jeffries as speaker.](https://images.axios.com/n08BbgbnEEFO-AVUrUmofnRVLRc=/243x374:4345x2681/1366x768/2026/07/06/1783348654688.jpeg)