Romanian president defends SPP chief linked to 1989 crackdown as protests planned outside palace

Story Timeline
1 day · 3 summary articles
Romanian president defends SPP chief linked to 1989 crackdown as protests planned outside palace
Romanian opposition leader demands SPP chief resign over 1989 Securitate role allegations
Romanian president urged to sack police chief over 1989 revolution crackdown role
Continuation
Romanian President Nicușor Dan on Thursday defended the head of the Protection and Guard Service (SPP), Gen. Lucian Pahonțu, after investigative reports linked Pahonțu to the violent suppression of protests during the 1989 revolution and the 1990 Mineriad. Speaking at a press conference in Chișinău, Dan stated that Pahonțu had not participated in repression and that the SPP functioned professionally under his leadership.
“Reprimarea manifestațiilor de la Revoluție, respectiv de la Mineriadă, este o pată în istoria României. Orice persoană care a participat la acțiuni de reprimare nu are ce să caute într-o funcție înaltă în statul român. Domnul Pahonțu nu e în această situație,” Dan said . He added that he had not conducted a specific managerial evaluation of Pahonțu, citing other priorities, and dismissed the investigative reports as unjustified by their content.
The president’s remarks followed a Recorder investigation published on Aug. 26, which documented Pahonțu’s role as a platoon commander in the Securitate’s UM 0305 Băneasa unit during the December 1989 crackdown near Bucharest’s Intercontinental Hotel. The report also placed Pahonțu’s unit in the June 1990 operations to clear University Square, though it did not allege he personally fired on protesters .
In response, four civic groups announced a protest outside Cotroceni Palace on Friday evening, demanding Pahonțu’s dismissal. The demonstration, scheduled from 19:00 to 23:00, carries the message “Vrem demiterea lui Pahonțu, domnule președinte!” . A separate call to action on Facebook, backed by groups including “Corupția Ucide” and “Inițiativa România,” accused Dan of failing to reform the system despite campaign promises .
Political reactions emerged swiftly. George Simion, leader of the Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR), alleged that Pahonțu had helped secure Dan’s presidential victory and accused media outlets of covering up such ties. “Ați descoperit că votul vostru pentru Nicușor a fost unul total greșit. V-au încolonat la secțiile de vot să votați cu matematicianul, onestul, pro-europeanul. Dar să știți că Pahonțu era securist demult,” Simion said . Dominic Fritz of the Save Romania Union (USR) called for full transparency, stating, “Trebuie să aflăm tot adevărul” .
From the United States, political scientist Vladimir Tismăneanu of the University of Maryland criticized Dan’s stance in a Facebook post. “Nu știu un alt caz de om politic în Europa postcomunistă care să-și fi făcut praf autoritatea cu o asemenea viteză,” Tismăneanu wrote, adding that Dan had abandoned intermediaries to work “direct cu Tartorul Pădurii” — a reference to Pahonțu’s alleged past .
Dan also addressed a question from Moldovan journalist Măriuța Nistor regarding Pahonțu’s failure to submit a required declaration on political police involvement for 18 years. The president replied that the SPP was not a secret service and that Pahonțu had been vetted by the Supreme Council of National Defense (CSAT) upon his 2005 appointment . Pahonțu, now 62, has led the SPP since December 2005 and was transferred to the reserve with a four-star rank in 2024 but retained his position.
Follow us for live European news
- 3
